Registration – IC Psychology UNDIP

Psikologi UNDIP Website

Menu

Psikologi UNDIP Website

Instagram Facebook Youtube

Home
Featured Speaker
Pricing
Committee
Registration

Menu

Home
Featured Speaker
Pricing
Committee
Registration

ICPSYCHE Registration

Welcome to our international event of Faculty of Psychology Universitas Diponegoro Indonesia
You can register for ICPSYCHE below

Hidden

Timestamp

Hidden

Virtual Account Number

Hidden

Virtual Account Number Prosiding

Unique ID

Title(Required)

Dr.

Prof.

Mr.

Mrs.

Ms.

Miss.

Other

Name(Required)

You can write your academic degree if available

First Last

Hidden

Full Name

Affiliation

Affiliation Type(Required)

Students and UNDIP Alumni

General Registration

Student Card(Required)

If you don't have student card, you can ask letter of recommendation as Alumni to the committee

Accepted file types: jpg, png, doc, docx, pdf, Max. file size: 2 MB.

Address(Required)

Street Address City State / Province / Region ZIP / Postal Code Country

Email(Required)

Phone Number(Required)

Please also use your country code

Participation(Required)

Participant (non-presenter)

Participant + Presenter CFP

Participation(Required)

Participant (non-presenter)

Participant + Presenter CFP

Hidden

Participation

Hidden

Participant Internal

350000

Hidden

Presenter Internal

750000

Hidden

Participant External

400000

Hidden

Presenter External

800000

Hidden

Participant External INT

26

Hidden

Presenter External INT

52

Abstract Title(Required)

Abstract(Required)

Max. file size: 2 MB.

Total

Rupiah Indonesia

Total

Dollar International

Hidden

Fullpaper Review

Did the study address a clearly focused question / issue?(Required)

Yes

Can't tell

No

Is the research method (study design) appropriate for answering the research question?(Required)

Yes

Can't tell

No

Is the method of selection of the subjects (employees, teams, divisions, organizations) clearly described?(Required)

Yes

Can't tell

No

Could the way the sample was obtained introduce (selection) bias?(Required)

Yes

Can't tell

No

Was the sample of subjects representative with regard to the population to which the findings will be referred?(Required)

Yes

Can't tell

No

Was the sample size based on pre-study considerations of statistical power?(Required)

Yes

Can't tell

No

Was a satisfactory response rate achieved?(Required)

Yes

Can't tell

No

Are the measurements (questionnaires) likely to be valid and reliable?(Required)

Yes

Can't tell

No

Was the statistical significance assessed?(Required)

Yes

Can't tell

No

Are confidence intervals given for the main results?(Required)

Yes

Can't tell

No

Could there be confounding factors that haven’t been accounted for?(Required)

Yes

Can't tell

No

Can the results be applied?(Required)

Yes

Can't tell

No

Was there a clear statement of the aims of the research?(Required)

Yes

Can't tell

No

Is a qualitative methodology appropriate (right methodology for addressing the research goal)?(Required)

Yes

Can't tell

No

Was the research design appropriate to address the aims of the research?(Required)

Yes

Can't tell

No

Was the recruitment strategy appropriate to the aims of the research? (HINT: (explained how the participants were selected)(Required)

Yes

Can't tell

No

Was the data collected in a way that addressed the research issue?(Required)

Yes

Can't tell

No

Has the relationship between researcher and participants been adequately considered? (HINT: How the researcher responded to events during the study)(Required)

Yes

Can't tell

No

Have ethical issues been taken into consideration?(Required)

Yes

Can't tell

No

Was the data analysis sufficiently rigorous? (HINT: Whether the researcher explains how the data presented were selected from the original sample to demonstrate the analysis process • If sufficient data are presented to support the findings)(Required)

Yes

Can't tell

No

Is there a clear statement of findings?(Required)

Yes

Can't tell

No

How valuable is the research?(Required)

Yes

Can't tell

No

Did the review address a clearly focused question? (HINT: An issue can be ‘focused’ In terms of • the population studied • the intervention given • the outcome considered)(Required)

Yes

Can't tell

No

Did the authors look for the right type of papers? (HINT: ‘The best sort of studies’ would • address the review’s question • have an appropriate study design (usually RCTs for papers evaluating interventions)(Required)

Yes

Can't tell

No

Do you think all the important, relevant studies were included?(Required)

Yes

Can't tell

No

Did the review’s authors do enough to assess quality of the included studies?(Required)

Yes

Can't tell

No

If the results of the review have been combined, was it reasonable to do so? (HINT: Consider whether • results were similar from study to study • results of all the included studies are clearly displayed • results of different studies are similar • reasons for any variations in results are discussed)(Required)

Yes

Can't tell

No

What are the overall results of the review?(Required)

Yes

Can't tell

No

How precise are the results?(Required)

Yes

Can't tell

No

Can the results be applied to the local population?(Required)

Yes

Can't tell

No

Were all important outcomes considered?(Required)

Yes

Can't tell

No

Hidden

Reviewer Decision(Required)

Accepted without revision

Revision are required

Hidden

Reviewer Notes

Hidden

Final remark(Required)

This paper can be recommended to be published in

Proceeding

Jurnal Psikologi (indexed Sinta 2)

Faculty of Psychology Universitas Diponegoro

Instagram Facebook Youtube